Thomson Reuters

I read with interest the article relating to Thomson Reuters being one of the top employers [Thomson Reuters rated one of Britain’s top employers] and also being voted a very ethical company by some outfit in New York [Thomson Reuters again rated one of world’s most ethical companies]. I especially note the statement “exceptional for its strong ethics and social conscience”. All seems a bit odd to me as being a Reuters pensioner and not having a pension increase for the last three years because the company won’t provide any additional funding despite their strong financial position.

I am getting the feeling that the articles published above are all a bit meaningless and should be taken with a pinch of salt as they do not reflect what is actually happening where the pensioners are concerned. How come the pensioners never get a mention in these glowing company appraisals?

Perhaps Tom Glocer and David Thomson would like to comment. ■