Skip to main content

News

Reuters' many flags - FT

Thomson Reuters' decision to end its London Stock Exchange listing will deny British index funds and those institutions with an outdated mandate to invest only in UK-listed companies the opportunity to share in future growth of the business, the Financial Times said on Wednesday.

Something has gone a bit awry when UK investors keep their exposure to London-listed Kazakh miners that are part of the FTSE 100 index but lose their stake in a global media business with deep roots in Britain, it said in a report under the headline “Reuters' many flags”.

But Thomson Reuters’ experience does not necessary rule out a dual-listed structure the next time somebody wants to mount a cross-border takeover using shares, rather than cash, the FT said.

Companies as diverse as Thomson Reuters' competitor Reed Elsevier, cruise company Carnival, and miner Rio Tinto maintain a dual listing.

“But the structure is an impediment when raising funds - or defending against a hostile bid - it imposes an additional running cost ($10 million a year in Thomson Reuters' case), and it adds complexity when simplicity is in fashion.”

The FT quoted a 1915 leaflet celebrating the 50th anniversary of Reuter's Telegram Company: "Reuter's Agency has always been recognised as a British institution representing the English point of view. [Its managing director] is in all respects an Englishman. The Directors, the Editorial Staff, and the correspondents are British pure and simple, and so, with the exception of a score, are the 1,200 shareholders."

Reuters once had to defend itself against allegations of undue German influence during the First World War, the FT said. “Times have changed. No one will accuse Thomson Reuters of treasonable behaviour for ending its London listing. The media group has recognised the inevitable reality and UK-based shareholders have voted with their feet. Since last year's deal with Canada's Thomson, the proportion of Thomson Reuters PLC's shares held in London has dropped from 58 per cent to less than 25 per cent. The balance of shareholder power has inexorably shifted to New York and Toronto.

“If there is concern about the decision in London, it won't be on patriotic grounds. Reuters had been a global company for years before the Thomson deal (although according to a history of the group, Sir Peter Job, managing director, dismissed a 1980 suggestion to relocate its HQ to Geneva as "pallid internationalism").”

The FT noted that “Paul Julius Reuter, the agency's founder, had two names (he was born Israel Beer Josaphat), two nationalities (German and English) and two religions (Jewish and Christian), so you wouldn't bet against Thomson Reuters adding another listing in future (Shanghai, perhaps). But, barring takeover or break-up, London is, regrettably, unlikely to be one of them.” ■

SOURCE
Financial Times