Comment
Faster, smarter Reuters
Friday 19 October 2018
MIKE ARKUS
OK, Steve, this is your second attempt at explaining what Reuters’ new “drang” to the future is, but it’s still all platitude and no beef.
What about a hypothetical example of your three “because” clauses on why the review is needed now?
Meanwhile, your three “understandings,” again are pure platitudinous “manager speak”. ■
- « Previous
- Next »
- 580 of 1806