Comment
Editorial advancement
Wednesday 4 May 2011
All this hand-wringing over the perceived Americanization or de-Britification of Reuters seems to reflect a shockingly unbecoming assumption that “British” is superior (or that “American” is inferior). For an organization with a global mission and a global constituency, shouldn’t the concern be to ensure its ethos does not reflect any (either) type of national bent? ■
- « Previous
- Next »
- 1587 of 1806